To PMI-Portland Attendees: Thanks, and a note…

First, let me acknowl­edge just how much of a rank ama­teur move it is to show up for an hour pre­sen­ta­tion with an hour and a half full of con­tent. That’s what you get for tool­ing around with a known quan­tity the day of the event with­out tim­ing your­self. I apol­o­gize for leav­ing you all up short and will do my best to sum­ma­rize here all that you missed. And again, thank you so much for brav­ing the weather to get to the ses­sion this evening.


Where were we…


We’d been dis­cussing the nature of com­mu­ni­ca­tion and had dis­cussed the idea that as project team mem­bers are get­ting younger, their habits and demands in terms of com­mu­ni­ca­tion are forc­ing an increased degree of trans­parency into the project process, and in the pro­mo­tion of the project across stake­holder groups. That’s about when I got the giant cane drag­ging me off stage.

Where do you go from here? 


First, ask for help. We already estab­lished that project man­agers are con­stantly chal­lenged man­ag­ing broad aware­ness beyond the con­text of the project. And rightly so; when you’re focused on deliv­er­ing results, it can be dif­fi­cult to see beyond your on board­ers. And yet, it’s impor­tant to do so all the same. So help your­self: get a com­mu­ni­ca­tions advi­sor. 

What is a com­mu­ni­ca­tions advi­sor? They’re out­side eyes. They’re your canary in the coal mine. They’re your con­sigliere. Come up with a bet­ter metaphor? Use it here. For large projects, it might make sense to have this per­son as a team mem­ber on your project. But in my expe­ri­ence, it was always help­ful to keep the out­side per­spec­tive of advi­sor and triage spe­cial­ist. You might think, from the exam­ple I dis­cussed in our ses­sion this evening, that it might be smarter to have some­one on your team. Remem­ber, the fail­ure of tonight’s project exam­ple had much more to do with com­plete opac­ity, and no com­mu­ni­ca­tions advi­sory capac­ity lead­ing up to fail­ure. There was only so much triage that could be done.

Sec­ond, define bound­aries. Enable your project teams to be opaque with their work where appro­pri­ate, but make sure you have clearly defined what “appro­pri­ate” means for your project. There are some projects around which strict secrecy must be main­tained. But if not, if you have the abil­ity and the author­ity to pro­mote the work of your project, ensure you have clearly defined what is absolutely inap­pro­pri­ate, and give the work that every­thing else is fair dis­cus­sion. 

Third, get out of the way. Inso­far as mon­i­tor­ing your team mem­bers, you’ll have to be the judge of the right level of con­trol to engage. But as a rule of thumb, the higher the degree of com­mu­ni­ca­tion between project team mem­bers, and across teams, the higher degree of cog­ni­tive pro­cess­ing of project prob­lems you will see. This means: more solu­tions. 

Sur­vey Your People


Too often, project man­agers are the last peo­ple to know about the lat­est tech­nol­ogy, the most inno­v­a­tive tools avail­able for team com­mu­ni­ca­tion. Engage your best resource and ask your team mem­bers what they are using — what they would like to use — to man­age com­mu­ni­ca­tion on the team. Ask them if they’re blog­ging, and if they are, do they blog about work. Begin to fol­low their work, their blogs, their twit­ter feeds. See how they are using tech­nol­ogy to engage in dynamic online rela­tion­ships with oth­ers, and ask them if they think there might be a way to bet­ter engage team inter­ac­tion on your own projects. 

Embrace and Extend


The beauty of mod­ern web tools lies in your abil­ity to cre­ate mash-ups. Indeed, the mash-up is a cor­ner­stone of the web 2.0 uni­verse. The sin­gle best thing you can do for your­self is become well-versed in RSS or “Really Sim­ple Syn­di­ca­tion”. RSS is the tech­nol­ogy that allows you to serve project data across new ser­vices, con­nect and aggre­gate project feeds, and pivot around your data in won­der­ful new ways. Once you have your hands dirty in RSS, dis­cov­er­ing the util­ity in tools that are enabled by it is a breeze.

There is Always a Sim­pler Set Of Tools


Bot­tom Line: the tool your com­pany uses is prob­a­bly not the best tool for the job. There are a num­ber of rea­sons this might be true, the biggest one being that the users in your group — your project peo­ple — were not the peo­ple who made the buy­ing deci­sion around your enter­prise tool. So before you dive in, make sure there isn’t some­thing sim­pler to enable com­mu­ni­ca­tion and col­lab­o­ra­tion at a level appro­pri­ate for your project.
Tools and Exam­ples
Take a look at Channel9 from the Microsoft Devel­oper Net­work for a great exam­ple of inter­nal pro­mo­tion of project efforts. It’s easy: pick up a cam­era and start ask­ing ques­tions of those around you. For Microsoft, it started as a place to chat with project man­agers, tech­ni­cal lead­ers, and devel­op­ers in the com­mu­nity with­out the inter­rup­tion of mar­ket­ing and PR folks. Now it’s prac­ti­cally a move­ment. 

We talked about Twit­ter in the ses­sion, which is great for the pub­lic dis­course and I encour­age you to sign up and start search­ing for project man­age­ment folks — there are a ton of them out there. Visit http://search.twitter.com.

But even bet­ter, visit Co-Op to see how one devel­oper has taken the theme of Twit­ter and turned it into a real group tool with legs. 

37signals.com has long been the panacea of sim­plic­ity. They took the tools we hold dear and stripped them down to the bare min­i­mum. No sacred cows. Noth­ing glitz. No Flash (or flash). Just fast work­group­ing, project man­age­ment, and CRM for small and large teams alike.

We could go on and on here. But for those in atten­dance in the ses­sion, I’m inter­ested in what you were able to take away. What are you going to do dif­fer­ently as a result of think­ing about project com­mu­ni­ca­tion more crit­i­cally? How are you going to enable your teams tomor­row dif­fer­ently than you did today? Com­ment here, or mes­sage me on Twit­ter!

Again, thank you for the oppor­tu­nity to par­tic­i­pate in the meet­ing. I look for­ward to run­ning into you all in real time soon!
Update: Howard Teibel Inter­view
I men­tioned in the ses­sion that I’d included selected com­ments from change spe­cial­ist Howard Teibel. Here is the Skype inter­view for your ref­er­ence. There are some inter­est­ing com­ments and illus­tra­tions from Howard’s expe­ri­ence, should you be inter­ested in delv­ing further!